Deposited · Revision 5.0
Integrated framework
The controlling public source for the three performers, five-hazard register, Accountability by Control, True Function, verification architecture, grounding, and the applied method.
Start here
The shortest path through HAOP: understand the integrated framework, see the complete work-design sequence, then run the entry diagnostic against one bounded workflow.
Deposited · Version 1.0
The HAOP Method
ARECC applied to AI-enabled work systems as a ten-step sequence from True Function and work-as-done through control engineering and revalidation.
Pilot tool
True Function Diagnostic
A browser-local entry tool that records how one workflow is described across the three performers. It does not certify safety or replace the full HAOP method.
Deposited research
These works control definitions, chronology, and the development boundary of the integrated framework.
Deposited · Version 1.1
Human-in-the-Design
Develops friction, choke points, Verification Requirement and Capacity, Verification Gates and Windows, transition states, and the Workflow Profile.
Deposited · Version 2.1
Verification Overrun
The hazardous condition in which a person is held accountable for a verification that exceeds the capacity to verify under the conditions provided.
Deposited · Version 1.0
The Collapse of Correction
Develops the workflow-level mechanism by which recursive transformation can suppress correction signals while the system continues to appear functional.
Working tools
Development status is explicit. These artifacts support learning and work design; they are not presented as validated instruments.
Live pilot · in-browser
True Function Diagnostic
Captures the nine True Function questions across human, AI, and organizational performers and produces a downloadable design record.
In development
HAOP Workbook
Practitioner operationalization of the ten-step method and its design record. Not yet deposited or empirically validated.
Purpose deposited · structure in development
AI Deployment Safety Data Sheet
A bidirectional hazard-communication instrument between the AI product boundary and the adopting work system. The complete standalone design remains in development.
Articles and field notes
Public writing that introduces, tests, or illustrates HAOP ideas. These pieces are kept distinct from the deposited framework record.
Published in ISHN
The Third Performer
AI does not choose whether to augment or surveil. The organization sets that direction before the technology reaches the worker.
Published article
The Second Performer
When AI moves from bounded assistance into operational influence by shaping sequence, priority, visibility, recommendation, routing, approval, or execution.
Field note
Architecture of Self-Destruction
A systems argument about recursive synthetic data, weak-signal loss, and removing the human system that keeps AI in contact with operational reality.