Deposited concept · Version 2.1

Verification Overrun

The check is assigned. The conditions required to perform it are not.

Human performance and verification · Concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20874288

The definition

Verification Overrun is the hazardous condition in which a person is held accountable for a verification that exceeds the capacity to verify under the conditions provided.

The condition appears where a person must interpret, review, approve, or intervene, so it can look like a human-performance problem. But the requirement, function allocation, evidence, time, staffing, permissions, and authority are set upstream through work design.

A missed defect does not by itself establish Verification Overrun. A functional gate can miss an error. Overrun is diagnosed when human verification accountability is retained, no functional gate governs the consequential transition under the stated operating condition, and work proceeds.

The work sets the demand

Verification Requirement is what a rigorous check demands at a specified workflow position and operating condition. Verification Capacity is what the workflow supplies there.

The four dimensions are conjunctive and interdependent:

Surplus in one dimension does not erase a required shortfall in another. Routing more work to a human does not create capacity.

Three transition states

A safe stop, constraint, deferment, return, transfer, or escalation is a functioning response. It is not Verification Overrun.

Design response

Correct the work design through Provision, Preservation, and Placement: supply the missing capacity, preserve the friction and slack required for correction, and place the gate at a consequential choke point inside the Verification Window.

Naming history

The hazard was originally deposited under the working title Cognitive Overrun. It was renamed because verification capacity belongs to the conditions of work, not the internal state of the worker. The earlier deposit remains part of the concept's lineage.